Stack-up not specified
Layer order and finished thickness given; dielectric thickness and copper weight missing
You confirmConfirm the proposed stack-up, or supply the complete stack-up table
layup-not-specifiedThe 19 queries engineering raises most often, with the options for each.
Layer order and finished thickness given; dielectric thickness and copper weight missing
You confirmConfirm the proposed stack-up, or supply the complete stack-up table
layup-not-specifiedLayer-by-layer total differs from the drawing's nominal thickness by more than ±10%
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B, and state the governing finished-thickness value
layup-thickness-mismatchDrawing thickness tolerance is tighter than the ±10% standard
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B; Option B also requires the cost change confirmed
thickness-tolerance-too-tightThe trace width required to hit the impedance target is outside the workable range
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B, and confirm the impedance target and tolerance class
impedance-not-met-by-layupA drawing marking matches no Gerber feature and no note on the drawing explains it
You confirmState what the marking means: reference, requirement to execute, or to be deleted
undefined-drawing-labelGerber and drill files only; no dimensioned drawing supplied
You confirmSign off our measured draft, or supply a formal drawing with tolerances and critical dimensions
no-dimensioned-drawingUnit too small to clamp and register economically at drill, mask, test and packing
You confirmConfirm the panel proposal, and state the maximum X-out units acceptable per panel
unit-too-small-panelizationBreakaway tabs set back from the unit edge, not flush with it
You confirmApprove moving the tabs flush to the unit edge, or state the constrained positions
tab-far-from-edgeCAD/CAM data and drawing give different values for the same dimension
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B, stating whether the data or the drawing governs
cad-drawing-dimension-conflictBlind or buried hole present; interconnect or mounting purpose not stated
You confirmState the hole purpose; if mounting, give barrel plating, thickness and bottom flatness
blind-buried-intent-unclearBreakaway holes sit partially over copper on every layer
You confirmApprove the 0.50 mm clearance on all layers, or state the current or shielding constraint
breakaway-hole-over-copperPlated and non-plated holes of equal diameter overlap at their centre distance
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B; for A, confirm the plating requirement for the slot
overlapping-holesAdjacent SMT pads share one mask opening with no dam between them
You confirmApprove adding the mask dam, or require the original opening and accept the bridging risk
no-mask-bridge-between-padsVias specified plugged on one face and open on the other, with HASL finish
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B, and state the final mask condition on that face
via-plugged-one-sideHole specified for plugging exceeds about 30 mil, beyond reliable mask fill
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A (with the acceptable finished diameter) or Option B
hole-too-large-to-plugHole specified for tenting is under about 10 mil; mask is wicked into the barrel
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A (change to plugged) or Option B (mask opening +5 mil per side)
hole-too-small-to-coverCharacters sit on pads or exposed copper with no process clearance
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A or B, and list the designators that must stay fully legible
legend-over-padSome legend line widths and character heights fall below printable resolution
Options — confirm one
You confirmName Option A (scale up to the published minimum) or Option B (print as supplied)
legend-below-resolutionStrings run across holes, past the finished outline or onto a cutter path
You confirmApprove relocating each string as a whole, or specify a target position for each
legend-crosses-hole-or-route